|
Post by swamperr on Sept 9, 2012 21:06:00 GMT -5
Not even his magic underwear will save him.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Sept 29, 2012 10:15:49 GMT -5
Keep watching mess nbc and thinking those happy thoughts. Same was said of Reagan in 1980.
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 2, 2012 13:33:30 GMT -5
Actually, heard on CNN today that the boost Obama got from the DNC is fading. They put the numbers at Obama 50%, Romney 47%, with a 3 % margin of error.
When Reagan ran against Carter, the media said the race was too close to call. Yet, Reagan won every state except 3.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 3, 2012 6:34:23 GMT -5
They'll claim Obama won the debate and you'll see them cook the numbers again to show he's so far out in the lead now Romney has no chance, that will be the chant all the way up until election night. Had Kerry already moving his furniture into the white house, lol.
People have short memory's though so they keep using the same old wore out tactic's.
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 3, 2012 13:29:10 GMT -5
The liberal media will say Obama won, no doubt about it. FOX will give a more unbiased opinion because even though they do lean to the right, they do have a couple of liberals on their staff as well.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 4, 2012 16:22:57 GMT -5
Well it was so pitiful they couldn't even spin it to make it appear he won, lol. In fact they all act like he has betrayed them, lmao. Be funny IF the media ever did turn on him and put him under the microscope they had Palin under. He would be toast if the TRUTH about him ever leaked out!
|
|
|
Post by huckleberry on Oct 4, 2012 17:36:21 GMT -5
Once they recognize he is losing...they will toss him under the bus like a cat. The liberals WILL NOT let anyone take them down. Mark my words, O loses as bad next debate, he is cooked in more ways than one. They did the same here in IL. to Blago when he got caught.
|
|
|
Post by swamperr on Oct 4, 2012 18:40:06 GMT -5
Obama didn't care last night because he knows he is going to win.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 4, 2012 19:24:58 GMT -5
Obama didn't care last night because he knows he is going to win.
So he's already got the election rigged?
|
|
|
Post by swamperr on Oct 4, 2012 19:38:50 GMT -5
How can he not win? He is running against a Mormon.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 5, 2012 6:57:26 GMT -5
So everyone prefer's a Muslim?
|
|
|
Post by swamperr on Oct 5, 2012 9:57:23 GMT -5
Yup, when a republican is losing, they always resort to using the "muslim" defense.......even the Muslims know Jesus never set foot in North America.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 5, 2012 14:16:39 GMT -5
Losing? Not worried about that, just don't understand how any supposed trapper could vote for a D for anything when their agenda and supporter's are dead set against us.
And im not calling O a muslim, im just repeating what HE HAS SAID in his books! Sorry they won't show you that on your beloved mess nbc show.
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 9, 2012 10:44:16 GMT -5
Yup, when a republican is losing, they always resort to using the "muslim" defense.......even the Muslims know Jesus never set foot in North America. And when a democrat is losing they always go with the "racist" defense. Since the miserable showing Obama had at the debate with Romney, the Gallup poll says the race is even. The last Rassmussen poll says Romney leads Obama by 2 percent. Ooops! Time for the democrats to pull their "racist" defense!
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 9, 2012 16:02:50 GMT -5
I really don't think this election will even be close, never have since day 1 before anyone even knew who would be running against him. Basically the same exact economy and national defense policy's Carter had, in some area's even worse. Yet they had Carter winning right up until election day then he got creamed worse than any other president I can recall.
Millions are just waiting on election day to rid us of this plague we've had to endure the past 4 years and get this country back up and running again. And so far all ive seen out of O's campaign is Romney is bad, vote for me. Hasn't ran on his own record a bit so far! If he did the poll's would look worse for them than they already do!
|
|
|
Post by swamperr on Oct 9, 2012 19:40:08 GMT -5
Obama got Osama, that is all that matters when it comes to the military.
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 10, 2012 13:50:37 GMT -5
Obama got binLaden thanks to Bush's so called illegal waterboarding tactics. They had a guy from the CIA who said this is where they got the intelligence information that helped them track binLaden down. I do give Obama credit for pulling the trigger, though.
Obama's huge cuts to military spending will hurt him with members of the military and a lot of the American public as well. He plans these huge cuts to the military, yet wants to increase the spending to organizations like Planned Parenthood, PBS, the Arts, millions in oil exploration to Brazil, etc.
We continue to alienate more and more countries; the last thing we want to do is reduce our military capabilities. The best defense we have is a good offense.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 10, 2012 16:50:26 GMT -5
He said NO to taking out bin laden 3 times before finally giving the go ahead, mainly cause he had to stop his golf game to go watch the operation which he could of cared less to see! He got an abassador killed for the first time in 30 years along with a couple of ex SEALS, he's turned the entire middle east over to muslim extremist, even helped them take over Libya setting the stage for them to kill our ambassador.
Now he's going to gut the military at a time the rest of the world like China is building up their's. Our tankers are over 50 years old, we have an old and aging airforce full of outdated planes we're not replacing costing us more to repair than it would to just replace them.
Morale among our troops across the globe has to be at the lowest level ever, 66 percent of them support Romney! That pretty much say's it all as far as his leadership of our military goes.
He's bowed down to every thug leader he can find to bow down to, Hugo Chavez wants him to win re election, he shut down our missile defense systems in Poland without getting a single thing from Russia for doing so then turned around and signed our missiles away with the new STARK treaty, meaning we'll disarm but Russia doesn't have to.
What part of his goofy policy's has strengthened our defense in any way?
But keep chanting, he got Bin Laden! All he did was interupt his never ending golf games to watch REAL men take out that thug! And if his policy's had been in place after 9/11 we wouldn't of had a chance to get Bin Laden or 100's of other terrorist that he still won't call terrorist but rather thinks of them as 'freedom fighters'!
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 15, 2012 16:35:28 GMT -5
He said NO to taking out BinLaden because he didn't want to interrupt his golf game??? I thought that was just Clinton who did that! I know they had binLaden pinpointed at his training camp on two different occasions after the first WTC bombing during Wild Bill's administration. He was at the Masters Tournament on one of those occasions and was too busy to be bothered. Had Wild Bill pulled the trigger at that time, WTC bombing #2 probably would never have taken place. Must be a thing with democrats!
|
|
|
Post by huckleberry on Oct 15, 2012 18:26:50 GMT -5
I don't believe Obama ever did give the go ahead to get Bin Laden. The Genrals got permission from elsewhere and it didn't matter anymore if he said yay or nay. he took credit for it of course, but what would he have done if it didn't go as planned? Ya can bet all those who had the balls to do the deed would have been thrown to the vultures.
Obama is beat and he knows it. Well he may not, he is most likely counting on his Chi town thugs to pull it off for him.
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 16, 2012 14:11:55 GMT -5
Based on this morning's Washington Post poll, they are dead even. That means, as liberal as the Post is, Romney must be ahead. According to Gallup and Rasmussen polls, Romney is ahead.
|
|
|
Post by shimyshaker on Oct 16, 2012 16:07:40 GMT -5
Not to defend Clinton but one of those times he had Bin Laden he turned down the call to take him out cause a Saudi Prince was also in that camp! It will never be known but id not be surprised if the Saudi's didn't have a whole lot more involvement in 9/11 than anyone knows!
O has been toast the past two years, media will keep it at dead even just to make people watch them to see what has happened since the day before! All one big joke is all this election is.
|
|
|
Post by trapper7 on Oct 17, 2012 10:53:53 GMT -5
I didn't hear anythng about a Saudi Prince, but read a book called, Dereliction of Duty. It's written by a Colonel who was at Wild Bill's side every day carrying the "Nuclear Football" as it was referred to. He writes in the book about how Clinton was so engrossed attending the Master's Tournament that even after repeated calls that he ignored, he never got around to putting out the order to take binLaden out.
According to the book, there was another instance where intelligence had binLaden spotted that Clinton did nothing about. That may be the time you're referring to.
|
|